Relationship Between Vertical Facial Pattern and Maxillary Sinus Floor Lifting Surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17921/2447-8938.2025v27n1p02-08Resumo
Abstract
Rehabilitation with implants in the posterior region of the maxilla is a great challenge due to resorption of the alveolar process and pneumatization of the maxillary sinus. We aimed to verify whether there was a relationship between the vertical facial pattern and dimensions and alterations present in the maxillary sinuses through multislice computed tomography and to evaluate its implications for the placement of implants in the posterior region of the maxilla. In this cross-sectional study, tomography examinations were performed in 60 total or partial dentate patients with little interference in occlusion, totaling 120 maxillary sinuses. The RadiAnt DICOM Viewer™ 2020.2 (64-bit) software was used to measure the linear distances of the maxillary sinus, pneumatization extension, and determination of the vertical facial pattern. There was no significant correlation between the maxillary sinus volume and facial pattern (p > 0.05) or between the facial pattern and sinusoidal membrane thickness. There was a significant correlation between the facial pattern and extension of pneumatization (p < 0.035) and between the facial pattern and presence of a septum (p = 0.012). The facial pattern also showed a significant correlation with the sinusoidal wall thickness (p < 0.01 for height H1 and p = 0.012 for height H2). There were also positive correlations among age, pneumatization, and breast volume (p < 0.05). The dolichofacial pattern showed greater pneumatization than the mesofacial pattern. The mesofacial pattern showed a lower prevalence of the presence of a septum; thus, the facial pattern may have the lowest risk of intraoperative complications.
Keywords: Multidetector Computed Tomography. Maxillary Sinus. Intraoperative Complications.
Resumo
A reabilitação com implantes na região posterior da maxila é um dos grandes desafios da especialidade devido à reabsorção do processo alveolar e pneumatização do seio maxilar. Este estudo objetivou verificar se existe relação entre o padrão facial vertical e as dimensões e alterações presentes nos seios maxilares através da tomografia computadorizada multidetectores e avaliar suas implicações para a instalação de implantes na região posterior de maxila. Foram avaliados, nesse estudo transversal, exames tomográficos de 60 pacientes dentados totais ou parciais com pouca interferência na oclusão, totalizando 120 seios maxilares. Utilizou-se o software RadiAnt DICOM Viewer 2020.2 (64-bit)™ para mensurações das distâncias lineares do seio maxilar, extensão da pneumatização e determinação do padrão facial vertical. Não houve correlação significativa entre os volumes do seio maxilar e o padrão facial (p>0,05), assim como entre o padrão facial e a espessura da membrana do seio. Houve correlação significativa entre o padrão facial e a extensão da pneumatização (p<0,035) e entre o padrão facial e a presença de septo (p=0,012). O padrão facial também apresentou correlação significativa com a espessura da parede do seio p <0,01 para altura H1 e p=0,012 para altura H2. Houve ainda uma correlação positiva entre idade, pneumatização e volume do seio (p<0,05). O padrão dolicofacial apresentou uma maior pneumatização quando comparado ao mesofacial. O padrão mesofacial apresentou uma menor presença de septo, levando a crer que é o padrão facial com menor risco de complicações transoperatórias.
Palavras-chave: Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores. Seio Maxilar. Complicações Intraoperatórias.
Downloads
Referências
Ata-Ali J, Diago-Vilalta JV, Melo M , Bagán L, Soldini MC, Di-Nardo C, et al. What is the frequency of anatomical variations and pathological findings in maxillary sinuses among patients subjected to maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography? A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017 Jul; 22(4):e400-409. Doi:10.4317/medoral.21456.
Lee W-J, Lee S-J, Kim H-S. Analysis of location and prevalence of maxillary sinus septa. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010;40: 56-60. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2010.40.2.56.
Lorean A, Mazor Z, Barbu HM, Mijiritsky E, Levin L. Nasal floor elevation combined with dental implant placement: A long-term report of up to 86 months. In J Oral Maxillofac Implants, v.29, n.3, p. 705-708, 2014. Doi:10.11607/jomi.3565.
Sentineri R, Lombardi T, Celauro A, Stacchi C. Nasal Floor Elevation with transcrestal hydrodynamic approach combined with dental implant placement: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 May-Jun; 36(3):357-361. Doi: 10.11607/prd.2540.
Kiliç SC, Gungormuş M, Parlak SN. Histologic and histomorphometric assessment of sinus-floor augmentation with beta-tricalcium phosphate alone or in combination with pure-platelet-rich plasma or platelet-rich fibrin: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;1–9. Doi: 10.1111/cid.12522
Chen Y-W, Lee F-Y, Chang P-H, Huang C-C, Fu C-H; Huang C-C, et al. A paradigm for evaluation and management of the maxillary sinus before dental implantation. Laryngoscope. 2018; 128: 1261-1267, 2018. Doi:10.1002/lary.26856.
Lana JP, Carneiro PMR, Machado VC, de Souza PEA, Manzi FR, Horta MCR. Anatomic variations and lesions of the maxillary sinus detected in cone beam computed tomography for dental implants. Clin. Oral Imp. Res. 2011;00:1-6. Doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02321.x.
Turhan B, Kervancioglu P, Yalcin ED. The radiological evaluation of the nasal cavity, conchae and nasal septum volumes by stereological method: A retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2019; 28(8):1-6. Doi:10.17219/acem/98960.
Lundgren S, Cricchio G, Hallman M, Jungner M, Rasmusson L, Sennerby L. Sinus floor elevation procedures to enable implant placement and integration: techniques, biological aspects and clinical outcomes. Periodontology 2000. 2017; 73: 103–120.
Chan HJ, Woods M, Stellac D. Mandibular muscle morphology in children with different vertical facial patterns: A 3-dimensional computed tomography study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2008;133(1):10.e1-10.e13.
Fernandes ACS, Nascimento Júnior GIB, Pereira FS, Galil KA, Farias IOB, Rebello IMCR, et al. Gingival biotype and its relationship to the maxillary membrane and lateral wall thickness. Journal of Oral Implantology, 2020.
Hamdy RM, Abdel-Wahed N. Three-dimensional linear and volumetric analysis of maxillary sinus pneumatization. Journal of advanced research, 2014;5:387-395. Doi:10.1016/j.jare.2013.06.006.
Ekizoglu O, Inci E, Hocaoglu E, Sayin I, Kayhan FT, Can IO. The use of maxillary sinus dimensions in gender determination: a thin slice multidetector computed tomography assisted morphometric study. J Craniofac Surg, 2014 May;25(3):957-60.
Whyte A, Boeddinghaus R. The maxillary sinus: physiology, development and imaging anatomy. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2019;48:1-15. Doi:10.1259/dmfr.20190205.
Raghoebar GM, Onclin P, Boven GC, et al. Long-term effectiveness of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(Suppl. 21):307–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13055.
Amine K, Slaoui S, Kanice FZ, Kissa J. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomical variations and lesions: A retrospective analysis using cone beam computed tomography. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 121(5): 484-489. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.021.
Kawakami S, Botticelli D, Nakajima Y, Sakuma S, Baba S. Anatomical analyses for maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a lateral approach. A cone beam computed tomography study, Annals of Anatomy. 2019; 226: 29-34. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2019.07.003.
Anbiaee N, Khodabakhsh R, Bagherpour A. Relationship between Anatomical Variations of Sinonasal Area and Maxillary Sinus Pneumatization. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2019 Jul; 31(4):Serial No.105.
Park W-B, Han J-Y, Kang P, Momen-Heravi F. The clinical and radiographic outcomes of Schneiderian membrane perforation without repair in sinus elevation surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;1–7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12752.
Sims¸ ek Kaya G, Daltaban O¨, Kaya M, Kocabalkan B, Sindel A, Akdag˘ M. The potential clinical relevance of anatomical structures and variations of the maxillary sinus for planned sinus floor elevation procedures: a retrospec-tive cone beam computed tomography study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21(1):114–21.
Tos M, Mogensen C. Mucus production in chronic maxillary sinusitis. A quantitative histopathological study. Acta Otolaryngol 1984;97(1–2):151–9
Costea MC, Bondor CI, Muntean A, Badea ME, Mesaroş AS, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Proximity of the roots of posterior teeth to the maxillary sinus in different facial biotypes. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics. 2018; 154(3): 346-355. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.006.
Ahn NL, Park HS. Differences in distances between maxillary posterior root apices and the sinus floor according to skeletal pattern. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2017;152(6): 811-819. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.021.
Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: A radiographic study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2008; 23: 48-56.
Ogle OE, Weinstock RJ, Friedman E. Surgical Anatomy of the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am. 2012; 24: 155–166. Doi:10.1016/j.coms.2012.01.011.
Ariji Y, Kuroki T, Moriguchi S, Ariji E , Kanda S. Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: a study using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 1994; 23: 163-168. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.23.3.7835518.
Cohen O, Warman M, Fried M, Shoffel-Havakuk H, Adi M, Halperin D, Lahav Y. Volumetric analysis of the maxillary, sphenoid and frontal sinuses: a comparative computerized tomography-based study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018; 45(1): 96-102.
Okşayan R, Sökücü O, Yeşildal S. Evaluation of maxillary sinus volume and dimensions in different vertical face growth patterns: a study of cone-beam computed tomography. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2017; 75(5): 345-349. Doi: 10.1080 / 00016357.2017.1310294.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Health Sciences
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os autores devem ceder expressamente os direitos autorais à Kroton Educacional, sendo que a cessão passa a valer a partir da submissão do artigo, ou trabalho em forma similar, ao sistema eletrônico de publicações institucionais. A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores. As provas finais serão enviadas aos autores. Os trabalhos publicados passam a ser propriedade da Kroton Educacional, ficando sua reimpressão total ou parcial, sujeita à autorização expressa da direção da Kroton Educacional. O conteúdo relatado e as opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
