Evaluation of Finishing/Polishing Techniques on Low-Shrink Posterior Restorative After Mechanical Cycling

Autores

  • Públio Juliana do Carmo State University of Campinas, Piracicaba Dental School, Department of Restorative Dentistry. SP, Brazil
  • Lúcia Trazzi Prieto State University of Campinas, Piracicaba Dental School, Department of Restorative Dentistry. SP, Brazil.
  • Cíntia Tereza Pimenta Araújo State University of Campinas, Department of Dentistry. SP, Brazil. Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valley, Faculty of Sciences of Health. MG, Brazil.
  • Josué Junior Araujo Pierote State University of Campinas, Piracicaba Dental School, Department of Restorative Dentistry. SP, Brazil
  • Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima State University of Campinas, Piracicaba Dental School, Department of Restorative Dentistry. SP, Brazil
  • Luís Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo State University of Campinas, Piracicaba Dental School, Department of Restorative Dentistry. SP, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17921/2447-8938.2019v21n1p46-50

Resumo

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a rugosidade superficial de resinas compostas à base silorano e metacrilato submetidas a diferentes técnicas de acabamento/polimento. Foram preparadas 12 amostras de disco de cada resina composta: P90®, Z350® e Carisma, divididas em 12 grupos de acordo com a técnica de acabamento / polimento: sem acabamento / polimento (controle); acabamento com ponta diamantada 1112 FF; acabamento com ponta diamantada 1112 FF associada a Enhance / Pogo; acabamento com ponta diamantada 1112 FF associada a Enhance / Pogo / Polishing / Pastas Poli I e II / Fotogloss. Após as leituras iniciais da rugosidade da superfície, os espécimes foram submetidos a ciclos mecânicos (1.200.000 ciclos) e submetidos imediatamente a leituras de rugosidade final. As medias de rugosidade superfícial foram analisadas estatisticamente por ANOVA e teste de Tukey-Kramer (α = 0,05). As imagens de MEV foram realizadas após o acabamento / polimento e após a ciclagem mecânica. O compósito P90 mostrou valores de rugosidade superficial semelhantes a outros compósitos investigados. Tough, mostrou diferença significativa nas técnicas de acabamento / polimento. O grupo de pontas damantadas apresentou maior rugosidade superficial que diferiu das outras resinas compostas (α <0,05). Enance / Pogo mostrou os menores resultados, que não apresentaram diferença em relação ao grupo de pasta de polimento (α> 0,05). O material restaurador posterior de baixa contração apresentou rugosidade superficial semelhante quando comparado as resinas compostas de dimetacrilato e são restaurações adequadas para região posterior.

Palavras-chave: Dente. Resinas de Silorano.  Propriedades de Superfície.

 

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of a silorane and methacrylate-based composite resins subjected to different finishing/polishing techniques. Twelve disk specimens were prepared from each composite resin: P90®, Z350® and Charisma, divided into 12 groups according to the finishing/polishing technique: no finishing/polishing (control); finishing with 1112 FF diamond burs; finishing with 1112 FF diamond burs associated to Enhance/Pogo; finishing with 1112 FF diamond burs associated to Enhance/Pogo/Polishing/Poli I and II pastes/Fotogloss. After initial readouts of surface roughness, the specimens were subjected to mechanical cycling (1.200.000 cycles) and immediately subjected to final roughness readouts.  Surface roughness means was statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer test (α=0.05). SEM images were realized after finishing/polishing and after mechanical cycling. The P90 composite showed surface roughness values similar to other investigated composites. However, significant difference was observed in finishing/polishing techniques. The diamond burs group showed the highest surface roughness differing from the other composite resins (α < 0.05). Enance/Pogo showed the lowest results, which presented no difference compared to the polishing paste group (α > 0.05). The low-shrink posterior restorative showed similar surface roughness when compared to dimethacrylate composite resins and suitable to posterior restorations. 

Keywords: Tooth. Silorane Resins. Surface Properties.

 

Referências

Marques IP, de Oliveira FBS, Souza JGS, Ferreira RC, Magalhães CS, França FMG, et al. Influence of surface treatment on the performance of silorane-based composite resin in class I restorations: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2018;11(4):222-8 doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2390-5.

Terry DA, Leinfelder KF, Blatz MB. A comparison of advanced resin monomer technologies. Dent Today 2009;28(7):122-3.

Goldberg M. In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(1):1-8.

Marghalani HY. Effect of finishing/polishing systems on the surface roughness of novel posterior composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010;22(2):127-38.

Eick JD, Kotha SP, Chappelow CC, Kilway KV, Giese GJ, Glaros AGet al. Properties of silorane-based dental resins and composites containing a stressreducing monomer. Dent Mater 2007;23(8):1011-7.

Lien W, Vandewalle KS. Physical properties of a new silorane-based restorative system. Dent Mater 2010;26(4):337-44.

Eick JD, Smith RE, Pinzino CS, Kostoryz EL. Stability of silorane dental monomers in aqueous systems. J Dent 2006;34(6):405-10.

Bechtold J, Santos PJ, Anido-Anido A, Di Hipólito V, RCB Alonso, D'Alpino PHP. Hardness, polymerization depth, and internal adaptation of Class II silorane composite restorations as a function of polymerization protocol. Eur J Dent 2012;6(2):133-40.

Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion. J Prosthet Dent 2000l;84(1):93-7.

Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Ural C, Kulunk T. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96(1):33-40.

Scheibe KGBA, Almeida KGB, Medeiros IS, Costa JF, Alves CMC. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Appl Oral Scie 2009;17(1):21-6.

Bashetty K, Joshi S. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites. J Cons Dent 2010;13(1):34-8.

Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of Polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31(1):11-7.

Ereifej NS, Oweis yg, Eliades G. The effect of polishing technique on 3-D surface roughness and gloss of dental restorative resin composites. Oper Dent 2013;38(1):1-12.

Setcos JC, Tarim B, Susuki S. Surface finish produced on resin composites by new polishing systems. Quint Int 1999;30(3):169-73.

Da Costa J, Ferracane J, Paravina R, Mazur R, Roeder L. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites. J Esthet and Restor Dent 2002;19(4):214-26.

Mourouzis P, Koulaouzidou EA, Vassiliadis L, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M. Effects of sonic scaling on the surface roughness of restorative materials. J Oral Sci 2009;51(4):607-14.

Gedik R, Hürmüzlü F, Coşkun A, Bektaş OO, Ozdemir AK. Surface roughness of new microhybrid resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(8):1106-12.

Maresca C, Pimenta LA, Heymann HO, Ziemiecki TL, Ritter AV. Effect of finishing instrumentation on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010;22(2):104-12.

Bedran-de-Castro AK, Pereira PN, Pimenta LA, Thompson JY. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on microtensile bond strength of a total-etch adhesive system. Oper Dent 2004;29(2):150-6.

Mitsui FH, Peris AR, Cavalcanti AN, Marchi GM, Pimenta LA. Influence of thermal and mechanical load cycling on microtensile bond strengths of total and self-etching adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2006;31(2):240-7.

Madhyastha PS, Hegde S, Srikant N, Kotian R, Iver SS. Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Dent Res J 2017;14(5):326-30.

Abed Kahnamouei M, Gholizadeh S, Rikhtegaran S, Daneshpooy M, Kimyai S, Alizadeh Oskoee P, et al. Effect of preheat repetition on color stability of methacrylate-and silorane-based composite resins. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2017;11(4):222-8. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2017.039.

Downloads

Publicado

2019-03-30

Como Citar

1.
Juliana do Carmo P, Prieto LT, Araújo CTP, Pierote JJA, Lima DANL, Paulillo LAMS. Evaluation of Finishing/Polishing Techniques on Low-Shrink Posterior Restorative After Mechanical Cycling. J. Health Sci. [Internet]. 30º de março de 2019 [citado 22º de dezembro de 2024];21(1):46-50. Disponível em: https://journalhealthscience.pgsscogna.com.br/JHealthSci/article/view/6097

Edição

v. 21 n. 1 (2019)

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Os autores devem ceder expressamente os direitos autorais à Kroton Educacional, sendo que a cessão passa a valer a partir da submissão do artigo, ou trabalho em forma similar, ao sistema eletrônico de publicações institucionais. A revista se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores. As provas finais serão enviadas aos autores. Os trabalhos publicados passam a ser propriedade da Kroton Educacional, ficando sua reimpressão total ou parcial, sujeita à autorização expressa da direção da Kroton Educacional. O conteúdo relatado e as opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.