Comparative Analysis of Different Methods of Marginal Microleakage Evaluation for Restored Teeth by Composite Resin

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17921/2447-8938.2024v26n4p221-225

Resumo

Abstract
Polymerization contraction of composite resin can cause marginal microleakage resulting in hypersensitivity, discoloration, secondary caries, pulpal involvement, and restoration failure. Different methods are used to assess these leaks. This study compared two methods of assessing marginal infiltration using dye penetration. Class V preparations were made in 45 fragments of bovine teeth, which were restored in composite resin. After finishing and polishing, the samples were randomized into 3 groups: GI (control, no sealing); GII (Fortify surface sealant (Bisco, Schaumburg, IL, United States of America); GIII (Biscover surface sealant Bisco, Schaumburg, IL, United States of America). The restorations were thermocycled and immersed in 2% methylene blue. For the qualitative infiltration assessment, the samples were analyzed under a stereomicroscope and classified between 0 and 3. The quantitative evaluation was carried out by analyzing the absorbance of the solution obtained by grinding the sample. The qualitative results were analyzed using the Kappa and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and the quantitative results using the Tukey test. Group II and III showed less marginal infiltration than the Control Group, although they did not differ statistically. It was concluded that there was no difference between the two methods tested.

Keywords: Dental Leakage. Dental Bonding. Composite Resins. Adhesiveness. Dental Sealants.

Resumo
A contração de polimerização da resina composta pode causar microinfiltração marginal, resultando em hipersensibilidade, descoloração, cáries secundárias, comprometimento pulpar e insucesso da restauração. Este estudo comparou dois métodos de avaliação da infiltração marginal através da penetração de corante. Foram realizados preparos classe V em 45 fragmentos de dentes bovinos que foram restaurados em resina composta. Após o acabamento e polimento, as amostras foram randomizadas em 3 grupos: GI (controle, sem selamento); GII (selante de superfície Fortify (Bisco, Schaumburg, IL, Estados Unidos da América); GIII (selante de superfície Biscover Bisco, Schaumburg, IL, Estados Unidos da América). As restaurações foram termocicladas e imersas em azul de metileno a 2%. Para a avaliação qualitativa da infiltração, as amostras foram analisadas sob um estereomicroscópio e classificadas entre 0 e 3. A avaliação quantitativa foi realizada através da análise da absorbância da solução obtida pela trituração da amostra. Os resultados qualitativos foram analisados pelos testes de Kappa e Kruskal-Wallis, e os quantitativos pelo teste de Tukey. Os grupos II e III apresentaram menor infiltração marginal do que o grupo controle, embora não diferissem estatisticamente entre si. Concluiu-se que não houve diferença entre os dois métodos testados.

Palavras-chave: Infiltração Dentária. Adesividade Dentária. Resina Composta. Adesividade. Selantes Dentários.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Paolone G, Baldani S, De Masi N, Mandurino M, Collivasone G, Scotti N, Gherlone E, Cantatore G. Translucency of bulk-fill composite materials: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2024;36(7):995-1009. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13241.

Azimi N, Mohammadi N, Parsaie Z, Fereidouni K. Microleakage and marginal integrity of surface-coated and laser-pretreated Class V composite restorations in primary teeth. J Lasers Med Sci 2023;14. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2023.11.

Basheer RR, Hasanain FA, Abuelenain DA. Evaluating flexure properties, hardness, roughness and microleakage of high-strength injectable dental composite: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2024;24:546. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04333-3.

Tohidkhah S, Kermanshah H, Ahmadi E, Jalalian B, Ranjbar Omrani L. Marginal microleakage and modified microtensile bond strength of Activa Bioactive, in comparison with conventional restorative materials. Clin Exp Dent Res 2022;8(1):329-35. doi: 10.1002/cre2.534.

Somani R, Som NK, Jaidka S, Hussain S. Comparative evaluation of microleakage in various placement techniques of composite restoration: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(3):264-8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1764.

Bayrak GD, Gurdogan-Guler EB, Yildirim Y, Ozturk D, Selvi-Kuvvetli S. Assessment of shear bond strength and microleakage of fissure sealant following enamel deproteinization: an in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent 2020;12(3). doi: 10.4317/jced.56281.

Saygi G, Karakoc P, Serbes I, Erdemir U, Yucel T. Effect of surface sealing on stain resistance of a nano-hybrid resin composite. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2015;49(2):23-30. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.24298.

Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Reduction of composite contraction stress through non-bonded microfiller particles. Dent Mater 1998;14(4):256-60. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(98)00036-0.

Marovic D, Par M, Tauböck TT, Haugen HJ, Negovetic Mandic V, Wüthrich D, et al. Impact of copper-doped mesoporous bioactive glass nanospheres on the polymerisation kinetics and shrinkage stress of dental resin composites. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(15):8195. doi: 10.3390/ijms23158195.

Sridhar LP, Moses J, Rangeeth BN, Sivakumar S. Comparative evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of two commercially available pit and fissure sealants. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(9). doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19996.8413.

Demarco FF, Collares K, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR de, Opdam NJ. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?. Braz Oral Res 2017;31:e56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0056

Ferracane JL. Models of caries formation around dental composite restorations. J Dent Res 2017;96(4):364-71. doi: 10.1177/0022034516683395.

Loguercio AD, Ñaupari-Villasante R, Gutierrez MF, Gonzalez MI, Reis A, Heintze SD. Five-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Dent Mater 2023;39(12):1159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.018.

Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21(9):864-81. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003.

Abad-Coronel C, Naranjo B, Valdiviezo P. Adhesive systems used in indirect restorations cementation: review of the literature. Dent J (Basel) 2019;7(3):71. doi: 10.3390/dj7030071.

Kalmowicz J, Phebus JG, Owens BM, Johnson WW, King GT. Microleakage of Class I and II composite resin restorations using a sonic-resin placement system. Oper Dent 2015;40(6):653-61. doi: 10.2341/15-006-L.

Santos MJ. A restorative approach for Class II resin composite restorations: a two-year follow-up. Oper Dent 2015;40(1):19-24. doi: 10.2341/13-142-T

Zhou Z, Guo D, Watts DC, Fischer NG, Fu J. Application and limitations of configuration factor (C-factor) in stress analysis of dental restorations. Dent Mater 2023;39(12):1137-49. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.014.

Chandra PV, Harikumar V, Ramkiran D, Krishna MJ, Gouda MV. Microleakage of class V resin composites using various self-etching adhesives: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(1):51-5. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1269.

Gurbuz O, Cilingir A, Dikmen B, Ozsoy A, Eren MM. Effect of surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and evaluation of their microhardness. Eur Oral Res 2020;54(1):1-8. doi: 10.26650/eor.20200020.

Haak R, Stache G, Schneider H, Häfer M, Schmalz G, Schulz-Kornas E. Effect of the adhesive strategy on clinical performance and marginal integrity of a universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions in a randomized 36-month study. J Clin Me. 2023;12(18):5776. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185776.

Calazans FS, Ferreira T de MJ, Ñaupari-Villasante R, Mendonça RP, Ornellas G, Albuquerque EG, et al. Influence of surface sealants on the quality of posterior restorations with bulk-fill composites: a 4-year randomized clinical trial. Dent Mater 2024;40(3):466-76. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.12.011.

Lupi-Pegurier L, Bertrand MF, Muller-Bolla M, Rocca JP, Bolla M. Comparative study of microleakage of a pit and fissure sealant placed after preparation by Er laser in permanent molars. J Dent Child (Chic) 2003;70(2):134-8.

Alsabek L, Al-Hakeem A, Alagha MA, Comisi JC. Efficacy of hydrophilic resin-based sealant: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2021;114:103816. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103816.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-12-30

Como Citar

1.
Soares V de M, Bomfim HLQ de O, Romão DA, Porto ICC de M, Fragoso LS de M. Comparative Analysis of Different Methods of Marginal Microleakage Evaluation for Restored Teeth by Composite Resin. J. Health Sci. [Internet]. 30º de dezembro de 2024 [citado 22º de fevereiro de 2025];26(4):221-5. Disponível em: https://journalhealthscience.pgsscogna.com.br/JHealthSci/article/view/13078

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)